You know, every time I see articles like this from a conservative outlet, I always wonder what they want to do about it. It's not like they believe in governmen

You know, every time I see articles like this from a conservative outlet, I always wonder what they want to do about it. It's not like they believe in government action to solve collective problems. Perhaps they should encourage their wealthy readership (I believe the median income of a WSJ reader is quite high) to marry these women who do not have fathers for their children? I believe this site is populated my males with reasonable to high incomes (I could probably be said to fit that description somewhat) - maybe we should encourage the single ones among us to find single mothers to marry in order to help solve the problem? I suppose I'm being absurd, but what is the endgame of these articles? I suspect it's just to shame single mothers (as though the party of Donald Trump has any room to try and shame others). I doubt the vast majority of single mothers explicitly planned to end up that way.