4 ms·

Agreed -- my concern is that subscriptions are really negative in long-term expectation for the consumer, and companies are profiting off that and don't want to

Agreed -- my concern is that subscriptions are really negative in long-term expectation for the consumer, and companies are profiting off that and don't want to lose all the people who are paying $10 for only $4 monthly utility. My coworker hates the subscription era and pines for the days of buying a CD-ROM with software lol

DaiPlusPlus 3y ago
Right. I've been a subscriber to Adobe's Creative Cloud for almost 10 years now - which means I've paid them upwards of $6,000 by now - even though I only use 3 programs (Acrobat, Photoshop, Illustrator) and even then I only really use base-level functionality that's been present in those titles long before they became subscription-only: if it weren't for (normal and understandable) platform-obsolescence (high-DPI support, support for new formats/codecs, etc) then I'd still be happy with a boxed edition of Creative Suite I could have bought for $1200[1] back in 2013 [1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20130808023019/http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-65163194-CS6-Design-Standard/dp/B007R0RJ8W https://web.archive.org/web/20130808023019/http://www.amazon...
- pbhjpbhj 3y ago
  Have you tried Scribus, Krita, Inkscape, say. Is familiarity worth the cost?
  - DaiPlusPlus 3y ago
    I haven't tried any of those suggestions, regrettably; as I've heard good things about them. But it's not just familiarity, but also about compatibility: I need to be able to open my PSD/AI files going back decades with absolute fidelity; and I know one of the dirty secrets of other programs that claim to have "PSD compatibility" is that they just read the composite version of the image, instead of being able to import individual layers with blending/effects settings, etc.