4 ms·
I think Madeofpalk’s comment explains the (possible) issue very well. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38608075 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=386080
by MBCook 3y ago
I think Madeofpalk’s comment explains the (possible) issue very well.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38608075 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38608075
Apple has always been “here’s the rules, follow or go away”. Google was “we’re open!” except they kept undermining that.
- deepsun 3y agoIt doesn't matter for US legal system how their marketing call that. It's either legal or not.
- somesortofthing 3y agoPresumably there was a practical side to the difference in approach beyond marketing.
- MBCook 3y agoRight. Apple never undermined any competitive App Store, they just didn’t allow them. That is legal according to the ruling on the Epic vs Apple trial.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- enraged_camel 3y agoIt did matter to the jury, though.