5 ms·
In the article it's said the proposal already included 160 plants in a big ring around yellowstone, resulting in the 16,000 years figure. So to get it down to
by jconnop 3y ago
In the article it's said the proposal already included 160 plants in a big ring around yellowstone, resulting in the 16,000 years figure.
So to get it down to 100 years you'd need 160^2 = 25,600 geothermal plants.
Perfectly reasonable, let's do it.
- pacificmint 3y agoPlus you’d take a great step towards solving our energy problems.
- Maxion 3y agoWe'll except the fact that deep geothermal plants are completely theoretic as a means of production - the final cost of power is a big ???. Most people want cheap power. Anything over around 20 cents a kWh makes it uncompetitive to fossile equivalents (e.g. wood / oil / gas heating).
- thorncorona 3y agoCalifornia is 50c/kwh…
- vlovich123 3y agoAccording to https://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/archive/2021/ https://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/archive/2021/ the average retail price for California was 20..
- iwontberude 3y agosounds great but anyone living downtown is paying over $0.50/kWh
- quickthrower2 3y agoSolar must be damn attractive
- anarazel 3y agoHm? I live in SF and it's considerably below that on average? https://www.bls.gov/regions/west/news-release/averageenergyprices_sanfrancisco.htm https://www.bls.gov/regions/west/news-release/averageenergyp... says the area averages ~0.35$
- arwineap 3y agoDowntown where? LADWP switched to time of use scheduling, so my rates are anywhere from 0.16/kwh to 0.21/kwh ( https://www.ladwp.com/ladwp/faces/ladwp/residential/r-customerservices/r-cs-understandingyourrates/r-cs-ur-electricrates https://www.ladwp.com/ladwp/faces/ladwp/residential/r-custom... ) SCE is a little more expensive with their tiered plans ranging from 0.32/kwh to 0.42/kwh For context, downtown LA should be all on LADWP
- iwontberude 3y agoDowntown San Jose is around $0.75/kWh if you use power to heat/cool your 2BR unit.
- danans 3y ago> We'll except the fact that deep geothermal plants are completely theoretic as a means of production Not theoretical at all: https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/geothermal/americas-first-enhanced-geothermal-plant-just-got-up-and-running https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/geothermal/americas-fir...
- soco 3y agoIn theory the cost of the whole thing blowing up should offset this investment costs but Don't Look Up (2021) convincing the folk about potential natural disasters.
- ben_w 3y agoNot only does it already exist, it's cheap enough that Kenya has some and wants more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_power_in_Kenya https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_power_in_Kenya Judging by the price tag of 9.1 Ksh/kWh listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_Kenya https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_Kenya (and looking up historical exchange rates because of the date of the link and their persistent inflation), that's about 0.085-0.090 USD/kWh.
- AdamN 3y agoiirc it works well in Kenya because the thermal gradient is really steep and the heat is right near the surface. I don't think that's common around the world. Local expenses (labor, etc...) are also cheaper than in many parts of the world. Geothermal is however one of the electricity sources with the fewest negative externalities so definitely should be pursued where possible.
- nathancahill 3y agoTouring the geothermal at Hell's Gate Park in Kenya is wild. If you've seen The Lion King, it's the inspiration for "the shadowy place over there" where the hyenas live.
- hollerith 3y agoExtract enough heat from Earth and Earth loses its magnetic field and then its atmosphere and oceans (from the effects of the solar wind) which sounds like a negative externality to me.
- Denote6737 3y ago"Anything over around 20 cents a kWh makes it uncompetitive" Cries in European
- Kuinox 3y agoDon't mistake price of production and selling price. When it takes times to construct additional production, you can sell the electricity at very high cost but have a low production cost.
- AlgorithmicTime 3y ago[dead]
- jackcviers3 3y agoThis is more like insurance. If you move to the mountains, you have to pay for special fire insurance because mountains have forest fires. The U.S. is an extremely productive economy with at least one enormous cyclical natural catastrophe attached to it. If this natural catastrophe is preventable, and the costs of prevention are outweighed by the costs of losing the US economy, then it's probably worth doing. I just assumed that it was one of those things that isn't economically or technically feasible.
- pram 3y agoThe Factorio method of problem solving, I like it.