3 ms·
How is that YC-specific?
by piotrSikora 14y ago
How is that YC-specific?
- lutorm 14y agoYou are affirming the consequent. It was never stated that this was a property of only YC.
- stcredzero 14y ago"Affirming the Consequent" should be the name of a Culture GSV. (Or maybe an ROU?)
- Dylan16807 14y agoHonestly I'd say randall is the one doing that. YC hackers are like Z. SpaceX is like Z. Therefore SpaceX is YC hackers (in spirit). piotrSikora isn't literally asking why such a thing is a property of only YC hackers. He's asking why randall is using property Z to label things as 'YC hacker'. I don't think your jumping on his imperfect wording is very helpful.