3 ms·
Why? Ai already makes money. My company is paying for GitHub copilot. I'm paying for chatgpt. I'm seeing more and more news article with images generated fr
by Slomotonoto 3y ago
Why?
Ai already makes money.
My company is paying for GitHub copilot.
I'm paying for chatgpt.
I'm seeing more and more news article with images generated from ai.
The demos for integration I have seen, work.
Every company which is right now learning how to leverage ai will be able to pivot and already have necessary things in place like a company, people, base infrastructure.
And the research is still super hot.
- somewhereoutth 3y agoI think the issue is that, per the article, even if it works it might only provide marginal value. So copilot may indeed be useful to you/your company, but perhaps, once all the bean counting has been worked out, not useful enough to justify the stratospheric valuations.
- chii 3y ago> not useful enough to justify the stratospheric valuations. but why is that a concern for anyone else but the shareholders?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- meheleventyone 3y agoEnshittification as a result, cost increases and so on.
- krater23 3y agoThe question is, how much do you pay and how much do you spare with it? Your company pays for GitHub Copilot, ok, but how many programmers are fired after they pay for it? Or does it have a meassurable effect at all? If not, this is a nice toy that will be removed soon. The news articles have generated images because they are cheaper than buying some stock photos. But stock fotos are still cheap.
- Slomotonoto 3y agoAi will get better not worse. You will not be able not to pay for code ai due to the advantage other companies have with it. For now I guess no job loss but also less new head counts