Boots on the ground had a financial stake in Sam staying on as CEO so they could sell their equity: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/30/openai-tender-offer-on-track

Boots on the ground had a financial stake in Sam staying on as CEO so they could sell their equity: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/30/openai-tender-offer-on-track-despite-leadership-fracas-sources.html https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/30/openai-tender-offer-on-track... I'm concerned that boots on the ground may be susceptible to motivated cognition due to their financial interest. I suspect that their finances come before upholding the charter for many of them. Why else did they get so upset when Helen said that shutting down OpenAI could be the right thing to do? That's pretty much implied by the charter.