3 ms·
> The UI and performance is just really good. The performance is fantastic, but if you're installing it on an iPod let's not kid ourselves: It's clunky and aw
by dabluecaboose 3y ago
> The UI and performance is just really good.
The performance is fantastic, but if you're installing it on an iPod let's not kid ourselves: It's clunky and awkward in comparison to the stock OS.
I've tried to use the in-built tools to fix it as much as possible, such as hiding the "file browser" from the main page. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any way to rename "Database" to "Music" without recompiling the whole thing, which is what the cranky old guard seem to suggest for any minor UX suggestion on the forums.
- kadoban 3y agoMaybe I just have different needs. All I ever want is to go in, pick an album or two, and hit play. I also use different hardware but typically it's consistent across hardware with similar number of buttons so I doubt that's much different.
- dabluecaboose 3y agoSure, I'm not saying it's bad necessarily. And it's probably an entirely different story on other hardware. I'm just frustrated that there's such a UX tradeoff on the iPod when some TLC could make it flat-out superior to stock.