3 ms·
> That's ~1 in 340 To put that number in perspective, on a regular year around 1 in 150 die. 1 in 340 over 2-3 years is shocking for the individual of course,
by fifilura 3y ago
> That's ~1 in 340
To put that number in perspective, on a regular year around 1 in 150 die.
1 in 340 over 2-3 years is shocking for the individual of course, like every death, but not a huge offset from that number.
- Kranar 3y agoIt's very hard to properly contextualize the number, however. For example it's true that the total number of deaths only increased by about 10-15% during COVID which is not trivial but also not a catastrophe either... however, you also can't really compare how people lived during COVID where everyone was isolated, to a typical year where people would be exposed to far more risks just naturally. You could imagine that if hypothetically everyone lived the way they lived in 2020-2022 with little travel, little outdoor exposure, deaths would likely plummet, and yet even with all those restrictions deaths increased by about 15%. It's very hard to get a sense of how much of a threat COVID posed since there's not much that it can be compared to.
- JambalayaJim 3y agoA proper contextualization of the number must include how old the average covid victim was. In my neck of the woods at least, hospitalizations and deaths were heavily skewed towards those in their 70s and 80s respectively.
- seanmcdirmid 3y agoThose numbers were about the same throughout the USA: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7218a4.htm https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7218a4.htm For example, in 2021, 95k died were 85+, 110k died were 75-84, another 110k from 65-74. But that rate of death for 85+ was 1.6%, and then .6% (75-84), .3% (65-74), .1% (55-64), .09% (45-54), .03% (45-54).
- Balgair 3y agooh, guess I shouldn't be sad then
- fifilura 3y agoI am sorry for your loss, it must have been a horrible year.