5 ms·

> All submitted binaries are saved and made available to any of the authors of the tools used so they may improve their decompilers. If you're such an author wh

> All submitted binaries are saved and made available to any of the authors of the tools used so they may improve their decompilers. If you're such an author who would like access, let us know!. oof

CaliforniaKarl 3y ago
Good that this is clearly mentioned up-front on their site.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
einpoklum 3y ago
If you believe that content you submit to websites is not examined by interested parties associated with that website, then - I have a bridge to sell you... or perhaps I should say a Google account to give you, free of charge.
- Carbocarde 3y ago
  Compare this policy to godbolt’s policy: > In short: your source code is stored in plaintext for the minimum time feasible to be able to process your request. After that, it is discarded and is inaccessible. In very rare cases your code may be kept for a little longer (at most a week) to help debug issues in Compiler Explorer.
  - saagarjha 3y ago
    Pretty sure links work basically forever
    - extraduder_ire 3y ago
      I think they changed it recently, but all of the code you submit is embedded in the URL. (after an anchor) So, it's stored by google's link shortening service, but is resubmitted to the site every time you load it.
  - boneitis 3y ago
    My bias may be showing, being a ctf-scene enthusiast. Most of these (tools on dogbolt) look like foss utilities you can run yourself. The rest, I'd imagine you are welcome to pay for licenses. Binary Ninja in particular, while maybe not cheap for everybody, isn't sky-high.
  - einpoklum 3y ago
    While it is possible they throw it all away: 1. If a third-party does their link-shortening, which gets the program text, then - it doesn't matter how nice they are. And if that party is Google then, well... 2. The language you quoted still allows them to keep effectively all information through mining aspects of it rather than keeping the entire code as a stretch of plain text. 3. If GodBolt or its servers are subject to US law, then there might be National Security Letters which compel it to pass information on to the US government, and keep that secret. And this is not a conspiracy theory, this what Snowden has exposed about Google, Apple, Microsoft, Yahoo etc. So - I respect and like the GodBolt'ers, but you don't have a good guarantee of your data being kept private.
smegsicle 3y ago
so like vscode?
saagarjha 3y ago
Sweet, free file hosting
marcellus23 3y ago
They make it very clear. If you don't notice that before uploading some private binaries, that's on you.
account42 3y ago
Yep. Remember that that means you are not allowed to submit any binaries for which you don't have the license to redistribute.

> All submitted binaries are saved and made available to any of the authors of the tools used so they may improve their decompilers. If you're such an author who would like access, let us know!. oof

CaliforniaKarl 3y ago

Good that this is clearly mentioned up-front on their site.

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]

einpoklum 3y ago

If you believe that content you submit to websites is not examined by interested parties associated with that website, then - I have a bridge to sell you... or perhaps I should say a Google account to give you, free of charge.

Carbocarde 3y ago
Compare this policy to godbolt’s policy: > In short: your source code is stored in plaintext for the minimum time feasible to be able to process your request. After that, it is discarded and is inaccessible. In very rare cases your code may be kept for a little longer (at most a week) to help debug issues in Compiler Explorer.
- saagarjha 3y ago
  Pretty sure links work basically forever
  - extraduder_ire 3y ago
    I think they changed it recently, but all of the code you submit is embedded in the URL. (after an anchor) So, it's stored by google's link shortening service, but is resubmitted to the site every time you load it.
- boneitis 3y ago
  My bias may be showing, being a ctf-scene enthusiast. Most of these (tools on dogbolt) look like foss utilities you can run yourself. The rest, I'd imagine you are welcome to pay for licenses. Binary Ninja in particular, while maybe not cheap for everybody, isn't sky-high.
- einpoklum 3y ago
  While it is possible they throw it all away: 1. If a third-party does their link-shortening, which gets the program text, then - it doesn't matter how nice they are. And if that party is Google then, well... 2. The language you quoted still allows them to keep effectively all information through mining aspects of it rather than keeping the entire code as a stretch of plain text. 3. If GodBolt or its servers are subject to US law, then there might be National Security Letters which compel it to pass information on to the US government, and keep that secret. And this is not a conspiracy theory, this what Snowden has exposed about Google, Apple, Microsoft, Yahoo etc. So - I respect and like the GodBolt'ers, but you don't have a good guarantee of your data being kept private.

smegsicle 3y ago

so like vscode?

saagarjha 3y ago

Sweet, free file hosting

marcellus23 3y ago

They make it very clear. If you don't notice that before uploading some private binaries, that's on you.

account42 3y ago

Yep. Remember that that means you are not allowed to submit any binaries for which you don't have the license to redistribute.