4 ms·
The amount of mental investment to write by hand versus type is significant. Technology assists are still rather primitive for English (you can’t argue with me
by 6stringmerc 3y ago
The amount of mental investment to write by hand versus type is significant.
Technology assists are still rather primitive for English (you can’t argue with me on this it’s the hardest language due to amalgamations) but lazy gonna lazy.
My thesis paper on file from 20 years ago already set forth a curriculum to address literary learning deficiency. Oh well. Point being is I’ve practiced the hard way and if you only know assisted methods I will eviscerate you. In fiction, I will always be better than you.
Hey Alexa, how do I spell schadenfreude?
Note: I have 100,000 hours in literary pursuits ranging from reading to writing to critique. Often mocked for my English degree. The truth is English is a wonderful weapon far beyond the grasp of the commoner and I will use it.
- wesleychen 3y agoExcept in this study they were comparing writing on a paper to writing on a tablet so it seems that somehow the fact that the writing happened to a piece of paper makes our memory better and its not just the act of writing itself.
- amelius 3y agoMaybe because mistakes are less expensive on a tablet.
- tgv 3y agoThat's testable, but if it turns out to have a benefit, you'll have to implement that effect on all tablets and phones, and make corrections more difficult (???). However, I don't think it has a benefit: people don't correct themselves on tablet/phone, so I think the cost of a mistake is the same as on paper, namely 0, unless people are really more careful when writing.
- vasco 3y agoRight now you're using it to get downvoted on a random website comment section so perhaps take yourself a bit less seriously!
- dmvdoug 3y agoYou will eviscerate me?! I need my viscera, good English major, please spare me.