4 ms·

For more technical details, here is the actual spec: https://github.com/adem-wg/adem-spec https://github.com/adem-wg/adem-spec If you are a nation state hacker

by mike_d 3y ago

For more technical details, here is the actual spec: https://github.com/adem-wg/adem-spec https://github.com/adem-wg/adem-spec If you are a nation state hacker, you can also install the convenient chrome extension which will tell you if you are allowed to hack a website or not: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/adem-dns-checker/ikjidcfbmgnajlnngicipbbekcdflcoi https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/adem-dns-checker/ik...

oefrha 3y ago
Yes, if I’m a nation state hacker I’m totally going to install a third party Chrome extension from the Chrome Web Store.
- Muromec 3y ago
  An alternative is to expose yourself to ICC and universal jurisdiction of War Crimes, I dunno, maybe you should. Or maybe not, so you can claim to be on the other side of carelessly/knowingly line. The point of this is not to make ICRC unhackable, the point is to make sure that 1) you can see you are specifically hacking protected communication 2) it's possible to prove to third party that you still continued with your war crimes business, because you either don't know better or don't care.
  - RobotToaster 3y ago
    > An alternative is to expose yourself to ICC Unless you're American, since the US doesn't recognise the ICC.
    - gwervc 3y ago
      Or work for Tsahal. Those "universal" jurisdictions aren't are universal they pretend to be, it's just another way to enforce power for people or nations already powerful.
    - sgift 3y ago
      Various states don't recognize the ICC, but that doesn't stop prosecution. What does stop prosecution is if no one transfers you to the ICC or you have a state that is willing to invade if the ICC prosecutes you. In theory, the US falls in the latter category, many others fall in the first. Nonetheless, people have been prosecuted even if their state of origin didn't recognize the ICC. Otherwise, it would be really easy for some crackpot dictator to just say his state didn't recognize the ICC under his dictatorship, so he cannot be prosecuted.
  - raverbashing 3y ago
    How many cybercriminals have been prosecuted (and punished) by the ICC again?

by mike_d 3y ago

oefrha 3y ago

Yes, if I’m a nation state hacker I’m totally going to install a third party Chrome extension from the Chrome Web Store.

Muromec 3y ago
An alternative is to expose yourself to ICC and universal jurisdiction of War Crimes, I dunno, maybe you should. Or maybe not, so you can claim to be on the other side of carelessly/knowingly line. The point of this is not to make ICRC unhackable, the point is to make sure that 1) you can see you are specifically hacking protected communication 2) it's possible to prove to third party that you still continued with your war crimes business, because you either don't know better or don't care.
- RobotToaster 3y ago
  > An alternative is to expose yourself to ICC Unless you're American, since the US doesn't recognise the ICC.
  - gwervc 3y ago
    Or work for Tsahal. Those "universal" jurisdictions aren't are universal they pretend to be, it's just another way to enforce power for people or nations already powerful.
  - sgift 3y ago
    Various states don't recognize the ICC, but that doesn't stop prosecution. What does stop prosecution is if no one transfers you to the ICC or you have a state that is willing to invade if the ICC prosecutes you. In theory, the US falls in the latter category, many others fall in the first. Nonetheless, people have been prosecuted even if their state of origin didn't recognize the ICC. Otherwise, it would be really easy for some crackpot dictator to just say his state didn't recognize the ICC under his dictatorship, so he cannot be prosecuted.
- raverbashing 3y ago
  How many cybercriminals have been prosecuted (and punished) by the ICC again?