3 ms·

i think the point trying to be made is mimicry and derivation are hard for us to discern from an AI. there is some complex definition for AGI that exists, but

i think the point trying to be made is mimicry and derivation are hard for us to discern from an AI. there is some complex definition for AGI that exists, but the fact laypeople cant make the determination, will always result in the GP comment

hfhdjdks 3y ago
Or maybe there's no secret sauce for intelligence and if the system / organism can display all that functionality then should just say it's intelligent. I don't have a strong opinion either way, but I'm not convinced by the "secret sauce" / internal monologue school of intelligence. If we want to be pragmatic, we should just think about smart tests and just assume it's intelligent if the system passes those tests. It's what we do with other people (I don't really know if they feel inside like I do, but given they are the same biological beings, it sounds quite likely)
bsenftner 3y ago
This point I'm trying to make is to describe comprehension as the equal to decomposing an observation, identifying each sub-component of an observation and the key characteristic of that component which when combined with the other sub-components create the original observed entity. This is akin to proving the object can exist, comprehension is mentally proving to yourself that this can exist and you're not being deceived. Comprehension is fraud detection via 'reversing compiling' an observation to prove to yourself that it is understandable and can indeed exist.