3 ms·
They weren't willing to gut the company. That's why Sam is back as CEO.
by 0xDEAFBEAD 3y ago
They weren't willing to gut the company. That's why Sam is back as CEO.
- jxi 3y agoIt sounded like they would if they could (for instance trying to sell to Anthropic or instating a "slow it way down" CEO), but they even failed at that. Not an effective board at all.
- 0xDEAFBEAD 3y ago>for instance trying to sell to Anthropic or instating a "slow it way down" CEO I wouldn't put these in the same category as "90% of staff leaves for Microsoft". In any case, let's not confuse unsuccessful with incompetent. (Or incompetent with immoral, for that matter.)
- jacquesm 3y agoThey were willing but failed, and mostly on account of not doing enough prepwork.