3 ms·
This is on machines given to employees yeah?
by vlovich123 3y ago
This is on machines given to employees yeah?
- WendyTheWillow 3y agoIf that’s the case, and it seems like it is, this is a ridiculous portrayal of what amounts to basic cybersecurity best practices for any organization. Every single Fortune 500 company does this by deploying agents to all endpoints that monitor activity for suspicious activity.
- jiayo 3y agoYeah, the reaction here is as though the forestry department can just pull up texts/phone logs from random citizens - but if this is just for their own staff, it's a bit of a nothing burger.
- coldacid 3y agoIt's both that (which is reasonable) and on/against the general public (which is not).
- vlovich123 3y agoReally? The article didn’t give any details or I missed it. Is there more details I can read of how it’s used against the public? Also, way too many people seemed to take the position of “oh it’s a company laptop so of course spyware is allowed”. It’s kinda gross how that’s accepted as “ok” - like if the company buys me a video camera or television for work that I can take home, it’s not ok if that fixed function appliance is reporting everything back to HQ. But for general purpose computing we’ve kind of accepted this breach of privacy without question. It’s really quite shocking (and no - it’s not a cybersecurity best practice to have spyware running on your employees devices).