4 ms·
If a company is legally required to use PostNord and PostNord can legally refuse to deliver mail, it effectively gives PostNord the power to control any company
by letmevoteplease 3y ago
If a company is legally required to use PostNord and PostNord can legally refuse to deliver mail, it effectively gives PostNord the power to control any company that wants to continue receiving mail. Regardless of whether they are using that power for good or evil here, I don't think it's a power they should have.
- einr 3y agoPostnord as a company is not refusing anything. Some of the workers for Postnord are on strike.
- frosting1337 3y agoWhy not? They're a private company. Isn't that usually what Americans are telling people, that corporations are free to serve who they please? But, more importantly, PostNord isn't doing anything - it's a unionised group of workers refusing to deliver Tesla products. That's how strikes work, and Musk's go-to course of action is to immediately proceed to legal action rather than negotiating and meeting the union's requirements.
- nomel 3y ago> They're a private company. How does a private company get the benefits of being legally required? That seems like a benefit that only a public company should have.
- philipwhiuk 3y agoIt's not really a private company. It's wholly owned by the government of Sweden and the government of Denmark.
- philipwhiuk 3y agoIt's not really a private company. It's wholly owned by the government of Sweden and the government of Denmark.
- hayleox 3y agoPostNord isn't refusing to do anything. Its employees are refusing to cross a picket line, and PostNord is unable to compel them to do so.