4 ms·
Well this thing about fingers, etc in drawings. Lets put it this way - for us mere mortals the generative images look very much okay. To artists and people who
by larodi 3y ago
Well this thing about fingers, etc in drawings. Lets put it this way - for us mere mortals the generative images look very much okay. To artists and people who actually draw something, well ... they very often spot inconsistencies in the whole production, including how fingers, arms, overall body posture, etc is presented. So it is exactly what we can expect - good enough on average, but actually a mediocre result of commonality. Thing is the wide audience chews in mediocrity all the time, and nobody seems to have been able to change this for ages...
- disgruntledphd2 3y agoIt's a weighted average over the prompts and data. Mediocrity is exactly what we'd expect from such an approach. Now, if we end up seeing mastery, that would be extremely interesting.
- sdwr 3y agoThis is a very mediocre understanding of deep learning :)
- disgruntledphd2 3y agoWhat else is it then? Basically all statistical models are weighted averages. I'm not sure why deep learning would be any different.
- michaelt 3y ago> Mediocrity is exactly what we'd expect from such an approach. No no, you see I prompted the AI with "masterpiece, photorealistic, 35 mm photography, cinematic, dslr, volumetric lighting, trending on artstation, 4k, 8k, hyper-detailed, epic digital painting by Greg Rutkowski" /s
- Der_Einzige 3y agoUsing controlnet fixes all of these problems and makes it where even real artists won’t be able to tell AI art apart from real art.