3 ms·
Wikipedia indicates it's still a private company. My recollection is they are failing to hit figures that would make for an attractive buy out or IPO.
by DoreenMichele 3y ago
Wikipedia indicates it's still a private company. My recollection is they are failing to hit figures that would make for an attractive buy out or IPO.
- Dylan16807 3y agoIf profitability isn't enough for them, I have no sympathy. And beyond that, how fast do they expect to grow after this many years? Be happy with a good thing! Their growth rate was very impressive!
- opportune 3y agoThey grew their employee count massively (400->2000) as their revenue grew over the past few years though. Part of that is, yeah, you have to spend money to make money. But I know for a fact not all of those employees were doing ad sales or direct monetization. You can speculate as to why they hired so many people: pandemic tech hiring FOMO, looking more attractive to investors, empire building, not being willing to settle for a paltry 10-figure valuation and so trying to build out to hit 11-figures. But they don't need that many people and they could easily become profitable by doing a big layoff (just as money software companies could). At this point it's not a question of survival or existence for them, nor of IPO readiness, so much as it is IPO optimization.
- DoreenMichele 3y agoYeah, just fire most of the staff. It worked so well for Twitter. I don't know the details. I didn't follow it that closely. I don't care that much. I've read that the business decision that sparked the blackout had something to do with trying to make money. They're a business, not a charity. There's no such thing as a free lunch. People want endless amounts of free shit. The people who don't want reddit unless it's both free and takes their orders are people I don't personally sympathize with. I don't really expect to argue this further. I've already argued it way more than I really care to.