> And you calling it a marketing stunt is a very different situation because you have a clear motivation of rhetorical device to fake an email and you're not s

> And you calling it a marketing stunt is a very different situation because you have a clear motivation of rhetorical device to fake an email and you're not staking your reputation on it. Whoa. I never said that. I never suggested it, and suggesting I said that is completely dishonest and reprehensible*. I'm going to assume you misread what I've written. I've said that there are many possibilities that could explain these actions, besides the truth, one of those being a publicity stunt. That, however, is no where near an accusation, merely speculation, and does not represent my believe in any way. Edit: This sounds like I'm calling you dishonest and reprehensible. That's not accurate. That would be if you were doing it on purpose. I just believe you misread what I wrote. Just being clear.