4 ms·
Anecdotally I’m way more likely to care about a grocery than any of the locations you’ve mentioned. The goal isn’t creating a historical representation of wher
by nostrebored 3y ago
Anecdotally I’m way more likely to care about a grocery than any of the locations you’ve mentioned.
The goal isn’t creating a historical representation of where things were.
It’s supposed to be functional.
- dkjaudyeqooe 3y ago> It’s supposed to be functional. For whom? Aldi who is highlighted? Google who is paid? Or the poor suckers trying to find something? A subtle dark pattern that Google uses is that they have roughly one size of POI, so there isn't enough space to show everything, or most things, it has to pick and choose. That artificial scarcity is tied to the profit motive (pay for prominence) and is user hostile. Sure, grocery stores are most common, but often you're looking for something else. Using small icons, smaller text, or some other UI affordance to facilitate finding what you need nearby, quickly and without text searching, would be great, but isn't in Google's interest.
- robertlagrant 3y ago> A subtle dark pattern that Google uses is that they have roughly one size of POI How many useful sizes could they have on a phone? > the profit motive (pay for prominence) Can you pay for this?
- 15kingben 3y ago> Can you pay for this? Yes - https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/9934637?hl=en https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/9934637?hl=en
- thanhhaimai 3y agoI think this opinion is unnecessarily cynical. The people who navigate to school tend to have one or two school per year. They learn the route by heart mostly. Schools are not interchangeable for the one attending them. On the other hand, I don't keep track of grocery stores, and I'm much more likely to look for them on a map (especially to plan where to stop by along the road). There are more likely explanations here than to immediately jumping to the cynical interpretation.
- guappa 3y agoWhy if you look for "restaurants" it will show you a restaurant that is 5km away and not one that is 100m away (but is indeed in the db)? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38401345 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38401345
- CogitoCogito 3y ago“Follow the money” is _not_ a cynical interpretation. I’d go so far as to say that ignoring the money is entirely naive.
- Lamad1234 3y ago[dead]
- gsinclair 3y agoFair, but one aspect of functionality is highlighting local landmarks like schools, so a viewer can more easily get their bearings.
- scyzoryk_xyz 3y agoNext to the Aldi there is a large grocery marketplace/bazaar that’s far more crowded - that isn’t marked with a pin at all. Point being - Aldi is paying for this service. The map is skewering reality. It’s not about historical representation, it’s about the fact that map-making has been around for awhile, and there are some great existing techniques for presenting that information that could be drawn on. But no, let’s melt colors together and highlight corporate chain stores with pins.
- Izkata 3y agoLikewise here - as you zoom in, the default pins show this tiny bakery before the huge grocery store everyone uses. The grocery story shows up at the same time as a really random set of apartment buildings.
- Doctor_Fegg 3y agoThe goal is different for different users of the map, as this thread pretty clearly demonstrates. But it's 100% fine that Google Maps isn't the all-singing all-dancing maps app for everyone. Other maps are available. Plurality is good.