3 ms·
It's way faster than C++ - doubly so if you count "time spent grokking a compiler error" - and if that's the other option (it usually is), I'll take Rust
by dymk 3y ago
It's way faster than C++ - doubly so if you count "time spent grokking a compiler error" - and if that's the other option (it usually is), I'll take Rust
- IshKebab 3y agoI agree it's faster than C++, but Linux is written in C which is much faster the C++ or Rust. Still, I would say Rust is fast enough now that compile time isn't a show stopper.
- offices 3y agoIf you spend enough time with C++ you become a compiler error transpiler that converts 100 lines of angle-bracket spam into what it 'really' means.
- dymk 3y agoI eventually got to that point, but my doctor said the ulcer was getting out of control