4 ms·
This is exactly backwards. The reason we create organizations like this is not for the benefit of the organization itself, but to accomplish specific goals. T
by comp_throw7 3y ago
This is exactly backwards. The reason we create organizations like this is not for the benefit of the organization itself, but to accomplish specific goals. Those goals are outlined in the charter. If the organization starts doing things that conflict with the charter, the responsibility of the board is to course-correct.
- Aunche 3y agoThe place to course correct is from the board room, not in public. If she had enough power to oust the CEO, she should have enough power to pressure him to make changes.
- comp_throw7 3y agoThe board can't compel the CEO to do specific things, only replace them.
- Aunche 3y agoOf course they can. If Sam Altman is really as heedless about AI safety as the board seems to think, GTP wouldn't be so aggressively aligned.
- 0xDEAFBEAD 3y agoA misaligned AI could act aligned in the service of its interests, just like an employee trying to steal from a company would act like a good honest employee. Methods for getting AIs to visibly act a certain way aren't necessarily sufficient to control advanced AI systems.