4 ms·
The vast majority of that video will never again be watched. If its just google footing the bill for it than I don't particularly care about it, but as soon as
by bensecure 3y ago
The vast majority of that video will never again be watched. If its just google footing the bill for it than I don't particularly care about it, but as soon as they start demanding that I pay out of pocket for it I would say they should first aggressively cull anything that is unlikely to be viewed. To the GPs point, I also don't care about the money they wasted growing their market share, and I'm certainly not interested in rewarding them for behaviour that destroyed their competition.
- soco 3y agoCulling that would probably throw together with the bathtub an entire trove of internet history...
- Dylan16807 3y agoWhat makes you think that? I feel like the obvious starting point is to sort videos by whether they meet a view count threshold like 1000, and I would expect that to preserve internet history quite well. I would love to see a breakdown of how many hours of video youtube is storing, sorted by how many digits the view count has.