3 ms·
The nonprofit side of the venture actually was in worse shape before, because it was completely overwhelmed by for-profit operations. A better way to view this
by unyttigfjelltol 3y ago
The nonprofit side of the venture actually was in worse shape before, because it was completely overwhelmed by for-profit operations. A better way to view this is the nonprofit side rebelled, has a much smaller footprint than the for-profit venture, and we're about to see if during the ascendency of the for-profit activities the nonprofit side retained enough rights to continue to be relevant in the AI conversation.
As for employees end masse acting publicly disloyal to their employer, usually not a good career move.
- smegger001 3y agoExsept to many it looks like the board went insane and and started firing on themselves. Anyone fleeing that isnt going to be looked on poorly.
- nordsieck 3y ago> As for employees end masse acting publicly disloyal to their employer, usually not a good career move. Wut? This is software, not law. The industry is notorious for people jumping ship every couple of years.
- hef19898 3y agoStill, doing so publicly still isn't a good idea, IMHO.
- dumbo-octopus 3y agoDisloyalty to the board due to overwhelming loyalty to the CEO isn't really an issue. I've interviewed for tech positions where a chat with the CEO is part of the interview process, I've never chatted with the board.