2 ms·
1. Illustrators 2. Photographers (Check out Photo.AI). I know a local photographer who takes nice portraits for businesses. Now people can use this service for
by vouaobrasil 3y ago
1. Illustrators
2. Photographers (Check out Photo.AI). I know a local photographer who takes nice portraits for businesses. Now people can use this service for their headshots. (You may argue that it's good for people but at which point does it remain good if NOBODY can use their creative talents to make a living.)
3. Writing. Many websites are now using writers to write their articles. That means they hire less writers. Again, you can say that it makes society more efficient and I guess it does for consumers, but those people such as copy editors will have to find new jobs.
You may say that new jobs will be created but we have not seen such a versatile tool that can take away so many jobs at such a quick pace before. Moreover, will the world really be a nice place to live in if most of the creative jobs or at least jobs involved IN producing something nice will be left to machines?
What about Hollywood and their desire to replace writers and actors? You may say that Hollywood is dead anyway, but I'm sure it's about to get a lot worse...
- rvnx 3y ago4. Translators 5. Programmers
- airstrike 3y ago6. Voice actors and narrators (eventually news anchors, reporters, etc) 7. Composers, hired musicians, eventually singers, producers
- hotnfresh 3y agoThere’s a real chance that one thing AI will make better—not just cheaper—is original scores for movies. Get us out of this “just match the shitty generic placeholder music we already edited the movie to” norm we’ve been in for almost two decades (which itself came about due to changes in technology!)
- Turing_Machine 3y agoThink of all the serfs and slaves that were put out of work by the invention of the tractor.
- dartos 3y agoI think I worded my question wrong. Where except in those industries I named are AI actually, currently, taking jobs