>Do you really need all 3? Is each one going to claim that they're the only ones who can develop AGI safely? What we need at this point is a neutral 3rd party

>Do you really need all 3? Is each one going to claim that they're the only ones who can develop AGI safely? What we need at this point is a neutral 3rd party who can examine their safety claims in detail and give a relatively objective report to the public.