3 ms·
>The problem with a statement like is that it leaves the door open to accepting any kind of canned generality as "abstraction in general". Not really https://
by famouswaffles 3y ago
>The problem with a statement like is that it leaves the door open to accepting any kind of canned generality as "abstraction in general".
Not really
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09196 https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09196
- joe_the_user 3y agoNah, By the very fact that there's paper here, whatever it's merit, the authors of the paper have codified their concept of generality and this doesn't validate the point I was replying to, which was essentially "my impression/feeling" is that it is better".
- famouswaffles 3y agoPoint is that it's good at abstract reasoning that isn't spatially grounded like in that paper. So it's not really leaving any door open. It's not a cop out. That's just how it is.