3 ms·
This is great, my annoyance with ads is their time-wasting nature. Skipping ads entirely isn't purely ethical, but this seems like a better compromise for both
by _aqmj 3y ago
This is great, my annoyance with ads is their time-wasting nature. Skipping ads entirely isn't purely ethical, but this seems like a better compromise for both parties. We want to use YouTube free of charge and will see the ads in a short manner that satisfies YouTube (I hope).
- travoc 3y agoSkipping ads is perfectly ethical. Who didn't hit fast-forward on their VCR or go get a sandwich during half-time?
- zamadatix 3y agoSomething can be both unethical and commonly done. In fact, some quite seriously unethical things were commonplace for centuries and others are commonplace now even though most consider them unethical at heart. Skipping ads needs to be ethical or unethical because it is, that it is done is irrelevant.
- amelius 3y agoThe Bible definitely needs an update for these kinds of questions.
- matheusmoreira 3y ago> Skipping ads entirely isn't purely ethical It absolutely is. Nobody is obligated to look at this crap. Their entire business model is based on sending people free stuff loaded with ads. They assume people are going to look at the ads. They only have themselves to blame if their assumptions don't hold.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]