2 ms·
Based on the firing? Because that’s all I think we (the public) have any insight into. I’m saying there is a reason this happened and 2/3 the board agreed. It
by no_wizard 3y ago
Based on the firing? Because that’s all I think we (the public) have any insight into.
I’m saying there is a reason this happened and 2/3 the board agreed. It needs to play out further for us to see if there is a problem here or not, honestly.
I find it hard to believe you can effectively muster a mandate worth of votes based on opinion alone
- lumost 3y agoAs others have pointed out, this board has no skin in the game. They just voted out founders who do have skin in the game (although through roundabout means). It’s a very tough sell that this board is doing the right thing.
- rirarobo 3y agoJust to clarify, one founder on the board, Ilya, has skin in the game, and was the reason behind Sam's firing. He convinced other members of the board that Sam was not the right person for their mission. The original statement implies that Ilya expected Greg to stay at OpenAI, but Ilya seems to have miscalculated his backing. This appears to be a power struggle between the original nonprofit vision of Ilya, and Sam's strategy to accelerate productionization and attract more powerful actors and investors. https://nitter.net/GaryMarcus/status/1725707548106580255 https://nitter.net/GaryMarcus/status/1725707548106580255
- no_wizard 3y agoFounders come and go. Doesn’t always make them a good. he wasn’t the sole founder either, it was founded by a consortium of people