2 ms·
And how exactly do you propose that we do that? Even if we pass laws forbidding AI, you still acknowledge the existence of criminals. They aren't going to sto
by AnimalMuppet 3y ago
And how exactly do you propose that we do that?
Even if we pass laws forbidding AI, you still acknowledge the existence of criminals. They aren't going to stop just because there's a law against it. (Neither will foreign governments. If Russian disinformation is messing with the US's internal political conversations - and I suspect it is - then a Russian disinformation AI could be that on steroids. Now imagine that the US has stopped their own AI research, and so is unable to counter or control this.)
- vouaobrasil 3y agoI propose a system or consortium of people that are united by a few simple rules. To summarize: (1) don't use AI and (2) preferentially support people who minimize their use of AI as much as possible. This consortium will also promote sustainable living in smaller communities, relying more on local talent and basic living sustenance as opposed to global corporations. This consortium will be more of a collection of local groups that rely mostly within themselves. Certainly, a good personal start for people with technology skills is: do not contribute to AI yourself, and don't use it for God's sake.