3 ms·
At big companies I worked for NR’s pricing was a complete nonstarter for the amount of data we had. No idea if DD is better on this but that was the problem.
by taurath 3y ago
At big companies I worked for NR’s pricing was a complete nonstarter for the amount of data we had. No idea if DD is better on this but that was the problem.
- atmosx 3y agoDD is 20-50% more expensive. DD actually requires a kidney every six months. Not saying storing and processing data is cheap but DD is the _most_ expensive on the block and _all_ of them look expensive (Elastic, Grafana, Honeycomb, etc.). At the same time there are so many solutions, there's clearly a market.