3 ms·
While its true that SMS used to cost per message (and outrageously at that) unlimited SMS/MMS (AKA, unlimited text) plans were cheaper (and on some carriers, pr
by no_wizard 3y ago
While its true that SMS used to cost per message (and outrageously at that) unlimited SMS/MMS (AKA, unlimited text) plans were cheaper (and on some carriers, predate) than unlimited data, often being only $10 a month or so as an add-on. Unlimited talk & text plans were relatively common as well.
In the EU for instance, the reverse was true. Particularly, unlimited data was cheap and affordable, where as SMS was quite costly (even more than in the US in some cases) so data heavy apps were easier to adopt. Hence, WhatsApp, Telegram etc. gaining so much popularity. iMessage was introduced much later to the rich messaging market than these apps in those countries (because mobile messaging apps were cheap to adopt in markets where mobile data is cheap).
There is much more competition in those countries with cheap mobile data in the rich messaging services space. In the US, unlimited data has had a more sordid history, and SMS / MMS had a much bigger adoption rate early on
- doublerabbit 3y agoThe days when each vendor of mobile phone were different from all the rest. Now all of them are Android and just unappealing.
- MBCook 3y agoSure it was $10/line. iMessage was free once you had a smartphone plan. And no, smartphone plans didn’t automatically come with unlimited SMS. I had to “upgrade” for that.
- ImJamal 3y ago>iMessage was free once you had a smartphone plan. Unless you went over your data limit.
- MBCook 3y agoGood point. If you stick to text (like SMS was) that would be extremely difficult. Start sending any kind of media and all bets are off.
- giantrobot 3y agoIf your phone spent most of its time on WiFi that was never a problem.