5 ms·
If GPT 5 jumps as far forward as going from 3 to 4 did, I'd go up to $30. That was a big jump, I'm a bit skeptical they can repeat it. That's also assuming I ge
by adventured 3y ago
If GPT 5 jumps as far forward as going from 3 to 4 did, I'd go up to $30. That was a big jump, I'm a bit skeptical they can repeat it. That's also assuming I get more prompts per hour and it continues to build in valuable features (DALL-E 4 etc). DALL-E 3 is expensive outside of ChatGPT, that's a tremendous value if you use it in the chat system.
It'd need to start making me breakfast every morning if we're going to keep climbing toward $40-$50. Although don't get me wrong, any improvements beyond 4 is an accomplishment, it's already an amazing service, I just don't feel like paying $40 for GPT 4 (too much of a price reach). $20 is fair for version 4. They need to keep adding a lot of value the higher they want to go.
- wongarsu 3y agoA $100/month GPT5 might price itself out of most B2C customers, but could still be hugely attractive to businesses. Both for chatbots, and as a productivity boost for knowledge workers. It just has to be good enough to justify the price increase over $20 GPT4.
- oceanplexian 3y agoI’d pay $100 hands down if they could simply get it to the speed of GPT3.5 Turbo. Right now ChatGPT Plus is slow and buggy I’ll end up not using it.
- tiahura 3y agoMicrosoft is charging $30 for Office Copilot.
- lukebuehler 3y agoI’m paying ~$50 for my cell phone plan. $100 for internet. And all that does is route data. I’d easily pay, say, $200 a month for a system that routes sufficient high intelligence. Gpt5 with a 20% improvement over 4 would qualify.
- JCharante 3y ago3 to 4 was a giant giant leap. 3.5 is basically useless. I would consider paying $100-$200 per month for GPT 5 because of the value add. It has really consumed/improved almost all aspects of my life and I have a chat window open 60% of the time I have my laptop open.