3 ms·

If you were so "pedantic", you would have known Planck length isn't "the resolution of physical universe". At the risk of ad hominem, it sounds like you're jus

• corethree 3y ago
  The Planck length is the smallest meaningful length, as far as we know. There's no risk here... your statement is a deliberate personal attack, there's no other way to put it. It's like stabbing someone, but stating that you're doing so at the risk of looking like your committing murder.
  • pdonis 3y ago
    > The Planck length is the smallest meaningful length, as far as we know. No, this is not correct. The smallest meaningful length we actually know about based on experimental data is about twenty orders of magnitude larger than the Planck length, i.e., about the size of an atomic nucleus. As I pointed out in response to your first post, your statement about the Planck length is a plausible speculation in quantum gravity, not a known fact.
    • corethree 3y ago
      How was this experimental data obtained?
      • pdonis 3y ago
        Particle physics experiments over decades. One of the primary goals of such experiments has been to probe smaller and smaller distance scales.
• vehemenz 3y ago
  The author said "meaningful" resolution. If you're so eager to correct others' pedantry, you might be more charitable before offering such a hasty rebuttal.