I did defeat an Alice motion. I never claimed to be an expert on software patents, I'm not sure where you got that from. I claimed to have actual experience in

I did defeat an Alice motion. I never claimed to be an expert on software patents, I'm not sure where you got that from. I claimed to have actual experience in the field and I shared what my experience encompassed and how its distinct from the narrative you weave in every patent-related thread. I described what the patents encompassed and you called it a software patent. It's not a "software patent", it has hardware components. >I was hoping to get a different view on the matter from someone who had had a different experience to mine. You come off as smarmy and disingenuous. Your comment here is also not actually responsive and just seems to be wrapped up ad hom. Answer the question: what does infringement have to do with the validity of software patents as a concept?