Do you want GP to use more words to say the same thing? He's right. Just to pick out their leading argument, they simulate a nuclear attack on the silos. AFAICT

Do you want GP to use more words to say the same thing? He's right. Just to pick out their leading argument, they simulate a nuclear attack on the silos. AFAICT they do not simulate alternative nuclear war scenarios where the silos do not exist. That seems like an important omission.