3 ms·
Connectivity could be easy. There's lots of extant subsea fiber connections in the Arctic region, because of satellite downlink stations there (polar satellite
by perihelions 3y ago
Connectivity could be easy. There's lots of extant subsea fiber connections in the Arctic region, because of satellite downlink stations there (polar satellite orbits are an easy way to guarantee revisits to the same Earth location, every orbit cycle). Fucking Svalbard, of all places, has 2.5 terabits of dark fiber, paid for partly by the USA:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard_Undersea_Cable_System https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard_Undersea_Cable_System
https://spacenorway.no/en/what-we-do/operational-infrastructure/the-svalbard-fibre-optic-cable-connection/ https://spacenorway.no/en/what-we-do/operational-infrastruct...
And the inverse is true as well: Starlink, the LEO satellite constellation, [edit: this is *no longer true*] spends the most loiter time and has the highest coverage, highest bandwidth, over the poles. I imagine you could plausibly get high-bandwidth, low-latency satellite backhauls from an Arctic datacenter.
- Scoundreller 3y agoIt’s Iridium that had best coverage over the poles (and actually useful because they’ve had inter-sat links since day 1). As all sats went right over the poles and that’s where latitude rings are the shortest. Meanwhile starlink has its poorest coverage over the poles, you can see mostly hollow space near the poles: https://satellitemap.space/ https://satellitemap.space/
- perihelions 3y agoMy knowledge was out of date! Still, the general principle's visible in that 3d visualization: the density of satellites is greatest at the highest latitudes within their range. They cluster there where the derivative d{latitude}/dt goes to zero.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]