3 ms·
40 years in prison for digitally altering some pictures and videos. I can't help thinking that what is punished here is the sexual deviance per se, much more th
by throw310822 3y ago
40 years in prison for digitally altering some pictures and videos. I can't help thinking that what is punished here is the sexual deviance per se, much more than any actual harm done.
- mhitza 3y agoThe headline is clickbait. Based on the article he possesed videos of one child (his cousin?) undressing and taking a shower (his production, by secretely recording), and videos of sexual content involving children. The deepfake side of the story is mentioned and I'm sure it had impact to at least some level in the trial. But acting on that fact alone would be legal abuse itself, because who was abused when creating those deepfakes? 40 years is beyond ridiculous for the possesion of child sexual material, and a video of a child taking a shower. But that's 'murica I guess.