2 ms·
> The usual AT&T syntax will drive you nuts, and the additional syntax for embedding assembly only adds to the misery. It's trivial to enable Intel syntax in i
by kouteiheika 3y ago
> The usual AT&T syntax will drive you nuts, and the additional syntax for embedding assembly only adds to the misery.
It's trivial to enable Intel syntax in inline assembly even under GCC. And if you're using Rust instead of C or C++ then the inline assembly syntax is actually really great and very pleasant to use.