3 ms·
Looks like you could do with less space for file buffers, but that's it. I suppose that would even come with a performance penalty. Sounds like marketing BS, ak
by tgv 3y ago
Looks like you could do with less space for file buffers, but that's it. I suppose that would even come with a performance penalty. Sounds like marketing BS, aka low-effort-lies-that-you-think-you-can-get-away-with.
- marcosdumay 3y agoHow much space you need for your file buffers depends mostly on your disk speed, not on the RAM speed... So no, you can't do with less of them.