4 ms·
How is one being a clown related to sadness if the distribution of sad people is same irrespective of profession?
by passion__desire 3y ago
How is one being a clown related to sadness if the distribution of sad people is same irrespective of profession?
- Dylan16807 3y ago"the distribution is the same" is a clear disproof of a link. "substantial number who don't" and "large number of people who don't" is not disproof of a link. A substantial number of people with cancer never smoked, and a large number of smokers don't get cancer. That sentence is completely true despite the strong link between the two. Also I was specifically talking about the artists and bipolar claim, not clowns. But where is that info about the distribution of sad people? I don't see it in the article. Or was it a hypothetical?
- finefrenchbrit 3y ago[flagged]