4 ms·
None of this had anything to do with Oracle the company, though, not sure why his being an Oracle employee is relevant.
by yborg 3y ago
None of this had anything to do with Oracle the company, though, not sure why his being an Oracle employee is relevant.
- Tao3300 3y ago"Part-time clown" even makes for a better headline IMO
- jehb 3y agoIt's especially misleading with that $54M part; obviously when people see that and the word Oracle, they assume this was all from one database license. /s
- Tao3300 3y agoSelect 54000000 from DUAL
- dakial1 3y agoI was wondering that also. Is not like Oracle had a special service for hiding Bitcoins for criminals. Oracle might have cut ad spend on Forbes...
- whatamidoingyo 3y ago"Oracle Employee" will get more clicks than "Brian Krewson".
- jahsome 3y agoAs a single throwaway fact somewhere near the end of the article it sort of makes sense to establish the dude as a tech guru. On the other hand, repeating the tie multiple times, including in the lede and headline reeks of SEO clickbait.
- hindsightbias 3y agoThey probably had to flip a coin if he drove a Tesla.
- Eumenes 3y agoI lol'd
- cjdrake 3y agoCame here to post this. The headline is yellow journalism. There's no reason to mention Oracle. Forbes used to have a strong brand. Seems like they print a lot of trash these days.
- INTPenis 3y agoI guess the implication is that Oracle is a den of thieves.
- bloodyplonker22 3y agoI felt like this is somewhat true after dealing with the salespeople at Oracle. After my company moved some data stored from Oracle to Snowflake, I felt like we were not getting robbed anymore.
- bhelkey 3y ago"Man helped cocaine dealers hide $9k" is not exactly a thrilling news story. Ideally news stories would have less sensational titles by here we are.