4 ms·
I scrolled through her twitter a bit and can't see a single instance of her posting a picture with a "fellow gen z-er", just her with middle-aged conservative p
by wtfwhateven 3y ago
I scrolled through her twitter a bit and can't see a single instance
of her posting a picture with a "fellow gen z-er", just her with
middle-aged conservative pundits. I know multiple non-monogamous
people and not a single one has ever said monogamy is outdated or ever
tried to coerce someone away from monogamy. Nothing about her story
sounds honest to me.
The conclusion of the article is "phones bad, take them away and
everything good" which is the same talking point politicians from the
era of leaded fuel want you to believe. She appears to solely blame
phones for zoomer depression and completely ignores everything
else. It's gross. I don't know why any reasonable person would ignore
everything else other than them wanting to push an agenda or they're
completely oblivious to the situation.
It's probably both, she's a wealthy individual (sites state her net
worth is $1.5 million, how many zoomers do you know that have such a
net worth or can ever achieve such a net worth?) and constantly tweets
conservative culture war stuff on Twitter.
Another thing I'm reminded of is the articles that sometimes make the
rounds with headlines like "This teen just purchased their own house!"
and other "rags to riches stories" and every single time it turns out
their parents are extremely wealthy and inherited the wealth from
their own parents. It's grossly dishonest.