3 ms·
> barefoot ...why was this detail added? i-is it even positive or negative? did the writer have foot fetish or shoes fetish? one word, but many more questions
by konstantinua00 3y ago
> barefoot
...why was this detail added? i-is it even positive or negative? did the writer have foot fetish or shoes fetish?
one word, but many more questions
- eftychis 3y agoWhy barefoot exactly? Something is missing here. When you execute a search it is not like you go around removing shoes. Then again usually that search and seizure is legal and not executed by the "judge..."
- pjc50 3y agoIt implies unprofessionality on behalf of the barefoot person. And possibly haste or even mental instability. Normally law enforcement wear substantial shoes or boots to avoid accidental or malicious injury. You never know if you're searching someone's house if they've left tacks out on the floor.
- alwa 3y agoIt seems like another detail supporting the idea that this “search” was highly irregular, casting it as far removed from a legitimate, professional exercise of official power. We’re lucky as hacker types that we can sometimes do our jobs barefoot and in casual clothes, but I can’t think of any situation (other than this one) where an agent of the state executes their official duties unshod.
- bondarchuk 3y agoLifeguards!
- sandworm101 3y agoFighter pilots. Search and rescue crews. I have personally seen more than a few at work in socks or bare feet. If your job requires you to quickly don survival kit or flightsuits, you hang around at work without shoes on. Also some military air traffic controllers and operations people on long shifts. I have done more than a few late nights at desks beside colored telephones, not always with my boots on. And I know of some occassions where cops have taken off thier boots when entering certain religeous places.
- op00to 3y agoI would never execute a search barefoot. Only a mad person would consider that professional.