3 ms·
> This is like saying employees should be personally liable for mistakes they make at work. This is like saying a dentist shouldn't be personally liable for th
by mcpackieh 3y ago
> This is like saying employees should be personally liable for mistakes they make at work.
This is like saying a dentist shouldn't be personally liable for the "mistake" of raping somebody under his care. Of course he should be!
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> like saying a dentist shouldn't be personally liable for the "mistake" of raping somebody The only way you can read what was written this way is if you don’t consider rape egregious.
- konstantinua00 3y agoas a non-native speaker, may I ask what egregious even mean? intentional?
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> may I ask what egregious even mean? intentional? Outrageously bad. Even if unintentional, it's behaviour that obviously isn't acceptable or part of the job. Like this lady.
- samus 3y agoIntentional is the crucial shade of meaning here. Excessive in a way that attracts (or at least should attract) attention. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/egregious https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/egregious
- hughdbrown 3y agoFrom Latin grex/gregoris (flock) and ex- (out of). egregious comes from a root which means "stands out from the flock" -- it's exceptional. Centuries ago, it had a positive meaning but not it is reserved for describing outstandingly bad events or people, etc.
- mcpackieh 3y agoYou think what this judge did wasn't egregious? She invaded this man's home with armed men and robbed him; I'm comparing felonies to felonies. It sure as hell wasn't a mistake, so why are you talking about mistakes? "Oops I tripped and accidentally fell onto his property and through his door." "Oops my tongue stumbled and I accidentally threatened to have the man arrested if he tried to film what I was doing." Yeah right. She knew she was breaking the law, that's why she freaked out about being filmed. None of this was a mistake.
- JumpCrisscross 3y agoAgain, I’m not sure how you’re misreading this thread to suggest anyone disagrees with this outcome.