3 ms·
I don't really know where to place this comment. Multi-language systems existed before, therefore Wasm should not, because it's already been done? It's interes
by titzer 3y ago
I don't really know where to place this comment. Multi-language systems existed before, therefore Wasm should not, because it's already been done?
It's interesting that none of the languages that you list made .NET a primary target and have all either bit-rotted unofficial ports or sunsetted their mainline support. It's hard to say whether languages that now target Wasm will suffer the same fate, since that depends on level of maintenance that each project allocates to particular targets. Still, I don't really get your point.
- pjmlp 3y agoThe usual amazement as if WASM was the first at anything...
- tambourine_man 3y agoBeing first rarely matters. Good execution at the right time is the crucial part.
- mtsr 3y agoAnd maybe not being the start of another MS embrace-extend-extinguish ploy.
- refulgentis 3y agoPeople know VMs existed before WASM