> What you’re talking about (it would be nice) is sufficiently distant to what we have right now as to be totally irrelevant. I disagree. :shrug: Guess we'll s

> What you’re talking about (it would be nice) is sufficiently distant to what we have right now as to be totally irrelevant. I disagree. :shrug: Guess we'll see who is right in like 10-20 years. It also sounds as though we're talking about different things maybe? Because a lot of automation, parsing and NLP are very much "solved" tasks for GPT-4 ignoring (important) edge cases and respecting the relative lack of progress in the domain until GPT-3. If you need agents and stuff, then yeah we haven't got that figured out. But neither will you (general you) with your hodge podge of if statements wrapping an LLM.