3 ms·
This seems like a very disingenuous interpretation of the verdict by avoiding "what it said" and then telling us what will actually happen (as though you can pr
by georgeecollins 3y ago
This seems like a very disingenuous interpretation of the verdict by avoiding "what it said" and then telling us what will actually happen (as though you can predict) or what's wrong with it. If I were a realtor what is wrong with it is it could threaten my fat commissions.
What the jury said was that the national association of realtors colludes to keep agent fees high in a way that violates anti-trust rules.
(edited for grammar)
- poulsbohemian 3y agoDude - any realtor paying attention has been watching this (and other) cases now for years. You think we haven't been monitoring this along with state legislation, Congressional action, MLS rule changes, and all the other things that have potential legal impact to our business and our clients? NWMLS (for those of you in WA) made rule changes over a year ago that were good changes regardless of the outcome of this case, plus the legislature made clarifying agency changes that go into effect in January. We're not the trolls you all think we are.