4 ms·
If we get enough demand that's definitely something we'll consider. We're still a small team, however, and we do everything in our power to not get distracted f
by rushingcreek 3y ago
If we get enough demand that's definitely something we'll consider. We're still a small team, however, and we do everything in our power to not get distracted from our main mission.
- tinco 3y agoMakes sense, we're also very small (pre-seed) so definitely no cash cow for you guys yet. We probably shouldn't be prematurely optimizing our prompting performance as it's not really a bottleneck, but a 4x improvement just by swapping an API would be too good not to act on.
- mike_hearn 3y agoIf you offer an API then you can be used with tools like https://aider.chat/ https://aider.chat/, which is the best way to use LLMs for coding. But if only available via the web it's not possible. BTW this is the main reason I pay for the OpenAI API.
- ilaksh 3y agoPlease consider releasing an API. Having a faster alternative to GPT-4 would be amazing for so many use cases. Especially for agents that do function calling.
- halfjoking 3y agoIf you offer an API you don't have to maintain a Visual Studio plugin. Trying to compete with tools like Cursor would be the real distraction. And Cursor is just the start - there will be innovative workflows built on top of APIs you can't predict. You're missing out not having developers build an ecosystem for you.
- karmajunkie 3y agojust as a point to consider, NOT having an api (and thus no integrations into my editors of choice) is the main reason i haven’t given y’all a fair test run. i’d almost rather not know what i’m missing (though the threads here have convinced me to give it a shot.)