3 ms·

In the Speedometer 2, Firefox is much slower than Chrome, which is a bit slower than Edge. But who cares! In real life, this makes no real difference. I respect

In the Speedometer 2, Firefox is much slower than Chrome, which is a bit slower than Edge. But who cares! In real life, this makes no real difference. I respect and trust the privacy of Mozilla. Features like containers and the ability to run Ublock and Tampermonkey on mobile are priceless!

criddell 3y ago
All of the major browsers are probably fast enough for now. It would be nice to see the emphasis shift to decreasing power consumption.
- astrange 3y ago
  Those are mostly the same thing. You save power by being faster so that you can go idle faster. Of course, there's a difference between going faster by using more resources and by just taking less time.
rg111 3y ago
With a 75 MBPS connection, FF loads everything I need instantaneously. Who cares about benchmarks?
- MBCook 3y ago
  See the sibling comment about the person using a very low spec PC.
windowsrookie 3y ago
It does still matter for people using low-end computers. My MacBook's screen cracked while on vacation recently and I had to buy an emergency laptop. I picked up a device with a Celeron 6305 and 4GB of RAM. I loaded up Firefox like I normally do, and it was so slow and laggy to the point it was unusable. I then switched over to Edge and it performed significantly faster, and was using less of the 4GB of RAM. I was surprised at how significant the difference was, but there was no denying it. Edge performs much better than other browsers on low-end PC's.
- sfortis 3y ago
  Chromium (new) EDGE or OG?
  - windowsrookie 3y ago
    Chromium based new Edge. I hate all of the Junk Microsoft has added to it. But if you are willing to take the time to turn it all off, it is a much more efficient browser than Chrome or Firefox. I'm not sure what Microsoft has done to optimize it, but on a low-end system it is very noticeable.
sfortis 3y ago
also: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...

criddell 3y ago

All of the major browsers are probably fast enough for now. It would be nice to see the emphasis shift to decreasing power consumption.

astrange 3y ago
Those are mostly the same thing. You save power by being faster so that you can go idle faster. Of course, there's a difference between going faster by using more resources and by just taking less time.

rg111 3y ago

With a 75 MBPS connection, FF loads everything I need instantaneously. Who cares about benchmarks?

MBCook 3y ago
See the sibling comment about the person using a very low spec PC.

windowsrookie 3y ago

It does still matter for people using low-end computers. My MacBook's screen cracked while on vacation recently and I had to buy an emergency laptop. I picked up a device with a Celeron 6305 and 4GB of RAM. I loaded up Firefox like I normally do, and it was so slow and laggy to the point it was unusable. I then switched over to Edge and it performed significantly faster, and was using less of the 4GB of RAM. I was surprised at how significant the difference was, but there was no denying it. Edge performs much better than other browsers on low-end PC's.

sfortis 3y ago
Chromium (new) EDGE or OG?
- windowsrookie 3y ago
  Chromium based new Edge. I hate all of the Junk Microsoft has added to it. But if you are willing to take the time to turn it all off, it is a much more efficient browser than Chrome or Firefox. I'm not sure what Microsoft has done to optimize it, but on a low-end system it is very noticeable.

sfortis 3y ago

also: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...